Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: lock listing

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Neil Conway <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org>
Cc: PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: lock listing
Date: 2002-07-22 18:34:43
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0207212338340.1144-100000@localhost.localdomain (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
Neil Conway writes:

> Using the SRF scheme discussed on -hackers yesterday. The only changes
> to the patch since it was posted on -hackers are cosmetic: I adapted
> the patch to apply cleanly against the latest CVS code, and changed
> the name of the return view to pg_show_locks_result.

A view or function shouldn't be called "show".  Just pg_lock[s] should be
fine.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net


In response to

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Neil ConwayDate: 2002-07-22 21:39:13
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] prepareable statements
Previous:From: Neil ConwayDate: 2002-07-22 16:02:55
Subject: Re: lock listing

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group