Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: SSL (patch 3)

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Bear Giles <bgiles(at)coyotesong(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SSL (patch 3)
Date: 2002-05-27 20:26:12
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0205272206420.2460-100000@localhost.localdomain (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
Bear Giles writes:

> Third patch - adds client verification of server certificate.
> This has some POSIX-isms that need to be expanded for Windows
> and Mac clients, and identifies (but does not fix) a problem
> on the backend that could be used for "denial of service"
> attacks on the current backend.

What happens if I don't want to use this feature and/or I don't have the
certificates set up?  Why are errors from getpwuid() thrown away, isn't
that a risk?

POSIX-isms in SSL code are OK.  I don't think WIN32 handles SSL yet.
Please use MAXPGPATH to size buffers for file names.

What exactly is the "problem" you identify?  I couldn't make it out.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net


In response to

Responses

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2002-05-27 20:26:47
Subject: Re: SSL (patch 4)
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2002-05-27 20:25:44
Subject: Re: SSL (patch 2)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group