Why does Postgres need the /bin/sh?

From: Stephen Amadei <amadei(at)dandy(dot)net>
To: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Why does Postgres need the /bin/sh?
Date: 2002-05-04 03:23:50
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0205032303580.1906-100000@rastaban.dandy.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs


Hey guys... second post of the day. If you read my last post about
Postgres 7.2.1 segfaulting on Slackware 8.0, you noted I am trying to
chroot Postgres. Unfortunately, my chrooted postgres cannot create
databases due to a 'system' call, which runs '/bin/sh'. Having the shell
in my chroot kinda defeats part of why I chrooted in the first place.

I upgraded to 7.2.1, hoping this routine was changed, but it hasn't.

While, IMHO, the safest way to do this would be to code the cp and rm code
internally, I have patched my copy to do a fork and execl to call the cp
and rm programs directly (and placed /bin/cp and /bin/rm in the chroot
jail) as a quick fix... I feel it gives a bit more security.

Can anyone tell me if there is any inherently bad side effects to this?
Or why the "system" call is necessary?

----Steve
Stephen Amadei
Dandy.NET! CTO
Atlantic City, NJ

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-05-04 03:28:50 Re: 7.2.1 segfaults.
Previous Message Stephen Amadei 2002-05-04 03:03:56 7.2.1 segfaults.