Re: the PostgreSQL Elephant

From: "Roderick A(dot) Anderson" <raanders(at)acm(dot)org>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: the PostgreSQL Elephant
Date: 2004-07-12 21:27:48
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.33.0407121419360.12865-100000@main.cyber-office.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Mon, 12 Jul 2004, Joshua D. Drake wrote:

> PostgreSQL Elephant != Slony Elephant != Mammoth Elephant
>
> They are all different logos, for different products, and should be used
> to advertise their respective products, not a different one altogether ...

Heck I seem to remember using a Cheeta based logo. How long ago would
that be? Well maybe that was in a different dimension of the multiverse.

Just adding some fuel^h^h^h^h^hthing to the ... ah discussion :-)

Rod
--
"Open Source Software - You usually get more than you pay for..."
"Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL"

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua Kramer 2004-07-12 21:30:49 IBM/DB2 PostgreSQL FUD?
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2004-07-12 21:24:03 Re: IBM/DB2 PostgreSQL FUD?