From: | "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce <bruce(at)centerstage(dot)com> |
Cc: | <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Prestige users |
Date: | 2004-05-05 16:48:51 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.33.0405051045510.1910-100000@css120.ihs.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Tue, 4 May 2004, Bruce wrote:
> We've got a raging debate going on now on whether we should move from a
> Foxpro back end to either PostgreSQL or MySQL.
>
> It's an accounting application and I feel that Postgres would be the better
> choice. Some other people (like my boss) thinks that MySQL would be better
> choice. His reasoning is that MySQL gets more publicity so it must be
> better. He says that since the Sabre airline reservation system and Yahoo
> run with MySQL, they are the best. Period.
>
> I'm sure Postgres has a couple prestige organizations that use database. If
> I could come up with some big names, I'm pretty sure we could make everyone
> into believers. Unfortunately, the only thing close to a "name" on the
> website is the company BSAF.
>
> Do you know any other well-known names?
>
> Thanks in advance.
Just try this simple test in MySQL and see if the boss still thinks it's
suitable for accounting:
mysql> create table test (i1 int, n1 numeric(8,2));
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec)
mysql> insert into test values (10000000000000,100000000000.345678);
Query OK, 1 row affected (0.00 sec)
mysql> select * from test;
+------------+------------+
| i1 | n1 |
+------------+------------+
| 2147483647 | 9999999.99 |
+------------+------------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
Wow, inspires you with confidence, huh?
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jonathan Gardner | 2004-05-05 17:38:40 | Re: Prestige users |
Previous Message | Rod Taylor | 2004-05-05 16:30:44 | Re: Prestige users |