| From: | "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Merlin Moncure <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL Performance Comparison |
| Date: | 2004-02-23 18:38:00 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.33.0402231137140.29494-100000@css120.ihs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Mon, 23 Feb 2004, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> Robert Treat wrote:
> > This came across the wire yesterday, thought I would pass it along. It
> > compares PostgreSQL vs. a "Major Proprietary Database"
> >
> > http://research.rem.nl/performance.html
>
> Are you (or anybody else) aware of any similar studies comparing pg to
> SQL Server? A study detailing not just performance but also reliability
> and administrative advantages, as well as PHB type stuff such as TCO,
> ROI, etc. would be nice.
>
> On another note, it's a pretty safe bet for this site to expect a
> takedown notice from the good folks at Oracle who have structured their
> license agreements to prevent precisely this kind of study from getting
> published.
Oracle? Who mentioned Oracle? :-)
but I would like to get a hold of a test cd of this fine database called
larry 8i. sounds like a nice product, as long as it isn't too expensive.
:-)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Bernier | 2004-02-23 18:41:38 | Re: PostgreSQL Performance Comparison |
| Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2004-02-23 14:29:35 | Re: PostgreSQL Performance Comparison |