Re: Bunch o' dead code in GEQO

From: "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bunch o' dead code in GEQO
Date: 2004-01-22 15:17:33
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.33.0401220816290.24807-100000@css120.ihs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Tom Lane wrote:

> The GEQO planner module contains six different recombination algorithms,
> only one of which is actually used --- the others are ifdef'd out, and
> have been ever since we got the code. Does anyone see a reason not to
> prune the deadwood?

considering the recent discussion about REALLY slow query planning by the
GEQO module, it might be worth testing each one to see which works best
before lopping them off.

But I don't do anything that needs GEQO, so for me, it doesn't really
matter.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-01-22 15:40:36 Re: cache control?
Previous Message Jean-Michel POURE 2004-01-22 15:15:36 PostgreSQL installation CD based on Morphix