On Sun, 11 Jan 2004, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
PE> Denis N. Stepanov wrote:
PE> > snprintf()/vsnprintf() functions are not ANSI-compliant
PE> Yes, they are.
Sorry, I was talking about ANSI X3.159-1989, which certainly does not declare
snprintf(). In practice it is diffucult to count on, say, C99-compliant C
runtime, especially for embedded systems.
In response to
pgsql-bugs by date
|Next:||From: Stephen Quinney||Date: 2004-01-12 10:15:33|
|Subject: Bug in functions returning setof where table has dropped column|
|Previous:||From: Costin Grigoras||Date: 2004-01-12 06:45:53|
|Subject: unique index problems|