Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: BUG #1044: snprintf() shipped with PostgreSQL is not

From: "Denis N(dot) Stepanov" <D(dot)N(dot)Stepanov(at)inp(dot)nsk(dot)su>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>,Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>,PostgreSQL Bugs List <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: BUG #1044: snprintf() shipped with PostgreSQL is not
Date: 2004-01-12 08:27:22
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.33.0401121424220.23836-100000@Linda.inp.nsk.su (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs
On Sun, 11 Jan 2004, Peter Eisentraut wrote:

PE> Denis N. Stepanov wrote:
PE> > snprintf()/vsnprintf() functions are not ANSI-compliant
PE>
PE> Yes, they are.

Sorry, I was talking about ANSI X3.159-1989, which certainly does not declare
snprintf(). In practice it is diffucult to count on, say, C99-compliant C
runtime, especially for embedded systems.

Thanks,
  Denis.



In response to

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Stephen QuinneyDate: 2004-01-12 10:15:33
Subject: Bug in functions returning setof where table has dropped column
Previous:From: Costin GrigorasDate: 2004-01-12 06:45:53
Subject: unique index problems

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group