Re: Email signature

From: "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Aleksander Kmetec <aleksander(dot)kmetec(at)intera(dot)si>, <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Email signature
Date: 2003-11-12 21:59:43
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.33.0311121458210.31983-100000@css120.ihs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Josh Berkus wrote:

> Aleksander,
>
> > Since it's supposed to look more professional, I'll be sending out my press
> > email in HTML form. For this purpose, I've created a signature file, which
>
> I reccomend against this. I do not find HTML e-mail to be "more
> professional", and spam filters tend to block HTML-only mail.

As long as it's multi-part mime with a text portion and an html portion,
and the attached graphics are reasonably small, then I see no big problem
with an email that contains an html portion.

However, it might be better to send an email with a link back to the html
version on a server somewhere so the user doesn't have to download the
larger html version unless they want to.

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Aleksander Kmetec 2003-11-12 22:26:04 Re: Email signature
Previous Message Christopher Browne 2003-11-12 21:35:48 Re: FW: [webmaster] Comparison to MySQL