| From: | "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Sean Chittenden <sean(at)chittenden(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, Darcy Buskermolen <darcy(at)wavefire(dot)com>, Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca>, Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>, Postgresql Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: 7.4 Press Release -- Draft #3 |
| Date: | 2003-07-22 18:25:02 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.33.0307221221550.19712-100000@css120.ihs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Tue, 22 Jul 2003, Sean Chittenden wrote:
> > > > Also: I may have a great quote from a Federal Reserve Bank
> > > > (woo-hoo); I waiting on confirmation.
> >
> > DENIED! I didn't think a national quasi-gov't organization would
> > approve being quoted, and they didn't ....
>
> Alright, then off the record, what'd they say? -sc
I wonder if we could the Freedom of Information Act to find out. :-)
It would probably be redacted to say something like:
"[DATABASE1] was the best choice of the bunch, for the following reasons:
It's much faster at [DELETED],
handles sub-[DELETED] much better than [DATABASE2], and provided better
data [DELETED].
The fact that all the [DELETE] is transactionable was one of the major
reasons for choosing [DATABASE1]."
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2003-07-22 18:30:52 | Re: 7.4 Press Release -- Draft #3 |
| Previous Message | Sean Chittenden | 2003-07-22 18:13:40 | Re: 7.4 Press Release -- Draft #3 |