Re: Which database part 2

From: "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Kaarel <kaarel(at)future(dot)ee>, <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Which database part 2
Date: 2003-06-16 18:38:30
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.33.0306161238010.2361-100000@css120.ihs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Fri, 13 Jun 2003, Josh Berkus wrote:

> Kaarel,
>
> > Why did SourceForge.net move from PostgreSQL to DB2?
>
> Perhaps because VA Software made a multi-million dollar deal with IBM?
> <grin>
>
> (Actually, I know as a VA stockholder that that was one of the
> conditions of the IBM deal)

As a followup to this, I, and many of my friends, noticed that
sourceforge's search capability was much more limited and much slower
after converting.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message scott.marlowe 2003-06-16 18:42:05 Re: Which database part 2
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2003-06-16 16:28:07 Re: A bit OT- RE: [PERFORM] Re-ordering .CONF params ... questions for this list