From: | "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | muhammad umar <whiplash77_77(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
Cc: | <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] Suggestion |
Date: | 2003-04-03 18:08:28 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.33.0304031108030.20048-100000@css120.ihs.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-docs pgsql-general |
On Mon, 31 Mar 2003, muhammad umar wrote:
> hello,
> im using PostgreSQL 7.3.1 on i686-pc-linux-gnu,
> compiled by GCC 2.96.
> i have a suggestion for the name of this DBMS, and
> that it should not be PostgreSQL but it should be
> PregreSQL, as im feeling its a DBMS that perhaps might
> be used 100 years ago,,proof for this is its
> techniques for showing errors that if we have a 1400
> lines sql query contain some error,,it give error as "
> parse error at or near <some column name>" ,,now if
> that column is used at several places ,,we might have
> to browse the whole of the cream.......
> this is one of example of the limit of stupidity this
> DBMS having,,,
> this used to waste the time that should be spent in
> development...so consider changing the name of this
> stupid DBMS,,
Two suggestions:
1: No one is twisting your arm, feel free to switch to something else.
2: Patches happily accepted.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-04-03 18:20:52 | Re: behaviour of inequalities with row constructors |
Previous Message | Stephan Szabo | 2003-04-03 15:50:23 | Re: Bug #931: bugs "create user" "alter user" |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Darren Ferguson | 2003-04-03 18:27:56 | Re: [GENERAL] Suggestion |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2003-04-03 15:08:36 | GPL'ed instr function in PL/pgSQL documentation |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Merlin Moncure | 2003-04-03 18:12:12 | Re: [HACKERS] OSS database needed for testing |
Previous Message | Darren Ferguson | 2003-04-03 18:02:45 | Re: updating table field whenever other table field changes |