On Wed, 3 Apr 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
> I'm confused. Your examples show the planner correctly estimating the
> indexscan as much cheaper than the seqscan.
> Cut-and-paste mistake here somewhere, perhaps? The plan refers to fact
> not fact_by_dat.
My apologies... It was indeed doing the right thing on the table that was
ordered by date.
Sorry for the wasted bandwidth.
In response to
pgsql-bugs by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2002-04-05 15:23:43|
|Subject: Re: What's the difference? |
|Previous:||From: Victor Wagner||Date: 2002-04-05 08:25:30|
|Subject: What's the difference?|