Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Inconsistant use of index.

From: Ron Mayer <ron(at)intervideo(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Inconsistant use of index.
Date: 2002-04-05 08:41:50
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.33.0204050040400.24107-100000@ron (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs
On Wed, 3 Apr 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> I'm confused.  Your examples show the planner correctly estimating the
> indexscan as much cheaper than the seqscan.
>...
> Cut-and-paste mistake here somewhere, perhaps?  The plan refers to fact
> not fact_by_dat.

My apologies...  It was indeed doing the right thing on the table that was
ordered by date.

   Sorry for the wasted bandwidth.
   Ron



In response to

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2002-04-05 15:23:43
Subject: Re: What's the difference?
Previous:From: Victor WagnerDate: 2002-04-05 08:25:30
Subject: What's the difference?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group