Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [PATCHES] Re: Fixes and enhancements to JDBC driver(take 2)

On Fri, 2 Feb 2001, Peter T Mount wrote:

> > What is the final resolution of this for 7.1? I noticed that you have
> > essentially commented out the byte array pooling code in current
> > sources. Given that 7.1 is rapidly coming to a close, is this
> > something
> > that is expected to get fixed and reenabled for 7.1, or is this going
> > to wait for 7.2.
>
> I commented it out to make sure that when 7.1 was released the driver
> would at least work (with it enabled we would have one broken driver).

At Microstate, we fixed the byte pooling code when it was still in
PG_Stream. We patched this and submitted our patch to pgsql-patches, and
it was accepted. It did have some nasty off-by-one errors. It does not
look like the fixes we did made it into the new, separate
org.postgresql.core.BytePoolDim[12] classes.

We've been using this code on an application with many tens of thousands
of queries per day for more than a month without any problems.

I've attached the production PG_Stream.java class that we've been using.

--
Richard Bullington-McGuire <rbulling(at)microstate(dot)com>
Chief Technology Officer, The Microstate Corporation
Phone: 703-796-6446 URL: http://www.microstate.com/
PGP key IDs: RSA: 0x93862305 DH/DSS: 0xDAC3028E