Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: ?Missing '#define FUNC_MAX_ARGS' in pg_config.h.win32?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Chris Ryan <xgbe(at)yahoo(dot)com>,PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ?Missing '#define FUNC_MAX_ARGS' in pg_config.h.win32?
Date: 2002-04-24 01:10:20
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.30.0204232109000.688-100000@peter.localdomain (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian writes:

> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian writes:
> >
> > > Based on this report, I am adding a FUNC_MAX_ARGS define to
> > > src/include/pg_config.h.win32.  Certainly if we have INDEX_MAX_KEYS in
> > > there, we should have FUNC_MAX_ARGS too.
> >
> > We probably shouldn't have either one in there.
>
> I thought so too, but the reporter complained something didn't compile
> without it.  What should we do?

I'm working right now on removing traces of FUNC_MAX_ARGS, INDEX_MAX_KEYS,
and NAMEDATALEN from frontend code (pg_dump and psql).  When I'm done I
will remove the definition from pg_config.h.win32.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2002-04-24 01:56:58
Subject: Re: Patch for xlog.c
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2002-04-24 00:57:35
Subject: Re: ?Missing '#define FUNC_MAX_ARGS' in pg_config.h.win32?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group