| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: ANSI Compliant Inserts |
| Date: | 2002-04-16 04:20:25 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.30.0204160018450.834-100000@peter.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Hiroshi Inoue writes:
> > Oh, clearly pg_depend will fix many of our problems, or make some
> > problems much easier to fix. I am excited to see it happening!
> >
> > We had a pg_depend discussion about 9 months ago and hashed out a plan
> > but were just waiting for someone to do the work.
>
> Probably I overlooked the conclusion then.
> What was the conclusion of the discussion ?
Personally, I think there wasn't any. Personally part 2, showing some
code is always a good way for new contributors to show they're for real.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-04-16 04:21:37 | Re: Operators and schemas |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-04-16 04:13:31 | Re: [SQL] 16 parameter limit |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2002-04-16 04:36:11 | Re: [PATCHES] [SQL] 16 parameter limit |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-04-16 04:13:31 | Re: [SQL] 16 parameter limit |