Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: ANSI Compliant Inserts

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>,Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ANSI Compliant Inserts
Date: 2002-04-16 04:20:25
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.30.0204160018450.834-100000@peter.localdomain (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Hiroshi Inoue writes:

> > Oh, clearly pg_depend will fix many of our problems, or make some
> > problems much easier to fix.  I am excited to see it happening!
> >
> > We had a pg_depend discussion about 9 months ago and hashed out a plan
> > but were just waiting for someone to do the work.
>
> Probably I overlooked the conclusion then.
> What was the conclusion of the discussion ?

Personally, I think there wasn't any.  Personally part 2, showing some
code is always a good way for new contributors to show they're for real.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net


In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2002-04-16 04:21:37
Subject: Re: Operators and schemas
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2002-04-16 04:13:31
Subject: Re: [SQL] 16 parameter limit

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2002-04-16 04:36:11
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] [SQL] 16 parameter limit
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2002-04-16 04:13:31
Subject: Re: [SQL] 16 parameter limit

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group