Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [SQL] 16 parameter limit

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>,John Proctor <jproctor(at)prium(dot)net>,PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [SQL] 16 parameter limit
Date: 2002-04-16 03:34:06
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.30.0204152332040.834-100000@peter.localdomain (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patchespgsql-sql
Bruce Momjian writes:

> The following patch adds --maxindfuncparams to configure to allow you to
> more easily set the maximum number of function parameters and columns
> in an index.  (Can someone come up with a better name?)

> Are we staying at 16 as the default?   I personally think we can
> increase it to 32 with little penalty,

If you want to increase it, let's just increase it and not add any more
configure options.  If someone wants more than 32 then we really need to
start talking about design issues.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net


In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Christopher Kings-LynneDate: 2002-04-16 03:35:57
Subject: Re: [SQL] 16 parameter limit
Previous:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2002-04-16 03:34:04
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] [SQL] 16 parameter limit

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Christopher Kings-LynneDate: 2002-04-16 03:35:57
Subject: Re: [SQL] 16 parameter limit
Previous:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2002-04-16 03:34:04
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] [SQL] 16 parameter limit

pgsql-sql by date

Next:From: Christopher Kings-LynneDate: 2002-04-16 03:35:57
Subject: Re: [SQL] 16 parameter limit
Previous:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2002-04-16 03:34:04
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] [SQL] 16 parameter limit

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group