Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: unknownin/out patch (was [HACKERS] PQescapeBytea is

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>,Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>, <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>,Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>
Subject: Re: unknownin/out patch (was [HACKERS] PQescapeBytea is
Date: 2002-04-09 18:13:19
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.30.0204091410380.685-100000@peter.localdomain (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Tom Lane writes:

> FWIW, CVS tip with --enable-multibyte builds and passes regression tests
> here (modulo the horology thing).  I concur with Chris' suggestion that
> you may not have done a clean reconfiguration.  If you're not using
> --enable-depend then a "make clean" is certainly needed.

Maybe we should turn on dependency tracking by default?  This is about the
(enough + 1)th time I'm seeing this.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net


In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2002-04-09 18:14:58
Subject: Re: Strange problem when upgrading to 7.2 with pg_upgrade.
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2002-04-09 18:07:14
Subject: Re: timeout implementation issues

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2002-04-09 18:23:47
Subject: Re: unknownin/out patch (was [HACKERS] PQescapeBytea is
Previous:From: John GrayDate: 2002-04-09 09:11:02
Subject: Re: unknownin/out patch (was [HACKERS] PQescapeBytea is

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group