| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ian Barwick <barwick(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Rod Taylor <rbt(at)zort(dot)ca> |
| Subject: | Re: psql and output from \? |
| Date: | 2002-03-12 00:19:17 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.30.0203111918100.690-100000@peter.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Ian Barwick writes:
> > The change to \a seems to be wrong-headed.
>
> What do you mean by "wrong-headed"?
It's fine as it is and the change makes it less fine.
> > The line for \du speaks of "configured" users. There are no
> > "unconfigured" users.
>
> That line was from the patch by Rod Taylor (March 1, 2002). Didn't think
> to change it. Does "list users" do the job? BTW psql-ref.sgml also
> says "Lists all configured users (...)"
That is equally incorrect then. "list users" is fine.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kyle | 2002-03-12 00:25:51 | Promising results with Intel Linux x86 compiler |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2002-03-12 00:14:46 | Re: Domain Support -- another round |