Re: PostgreSQL 7.2 docs

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Rich Morin <rdm(at)cfcl(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 7.2 docs
Date: 2002-02-27 00:23:11
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.30.0202261921140.685-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

Rich Morin writes:

> At 5:38 PM -0500 2/26/02, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >It is in the nature of the way we maintain and format our documentation
> >that any format can be viewed as a reformatted version of another format.
>
> So, if I'm printing the PostgreSQL "books", FAQs, and the "internals.ps"
> file, I've got things pretty well covered.

Well, the internals.ps paper was removed for a reason, so I'd advise you
not to print it.

The FAQ's are the only thing that seem to escape the unified DocBook
source for some reason.

Btw., how do you plan to format the material for printing?

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rich Morin 2002-02-27 01:08:58 Re: PostgreSQL 7.2 docs
Previous Message Rich Morin 2002-02-26 23:04:49 Re: PostgreSQL 7.2 docs