Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: PostgreSQL 7.2 docs

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Rich Morin <rdm(at)cfcl(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 7.2 docs
Date: 2002-02-27 00:23:11
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.30.0202261921140.685-100000@peter.localdomain (view raw or whole thread)
Lists: pgsql-docs
Rich Morin writes:

> At 5:38 PM -0500 2/26/02, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >It is in the nature of the way we maintain and format our documentation
> >that any format can be viewed as a reformatted version of another format.
> So, if I'm printing the PostgreSQL "books", FAQs, and the ""
> file, I've got things pretty well covered.

Well, the paper was removed for a reason, so I'd advise you
not to print it.

The FAQ's are the only thing that seem to escape the unified DocBook
source for some reason.

Btw., how do you plan to format the material for printing?

Peter Eisentraut   peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to


pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Rich MorinDate: 2002-02-27 01:08:58
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 7.2 docs
Previous:From: Rich MorinDate: 2002-02-26 23:04:49
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 7.2 docs

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2015 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group