Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Formatted man pages

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>,PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Formatted man pages
Date: 2002-02-22 05:57:30
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.30.0202220054490.683-100000@peter.localdomain (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs
Bruce Momjian writes:

> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian writes:
> >
> > > Oh, so it is in the main tarball and not in the docs tarball?
> >
> > Yeah, because that's where the programs are that the man pages document.
>
> But shouldn't it be in the doc tarball too?

You could argue for them being in the docs tarball, but not for "too",
because these tarballs must be nonoverlapping (and you need to main
tarball anyway to do anything with the others).

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net


In response to

Responses

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Viktor VislobokovDate: 2002-02-22 11:01:02
Subject: PostgreSQL FAQ (new version)
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2002-02-22 05:56:06
Subject: Re: Formatted man pages

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group