| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Call for objections: revision of keyword classification |
| Date: | 2001-11-15 16:16:21 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.30.0111151643480.633-100000@peter.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane writes:
> BTW, is there any good reason that AS is not a member of the ColLabel
> set? It wouldn't cause a parse conflict to add it (I just tested that)
> and it seems like that's a special case we could do without.
Fine with me. I guess I'll wait with the new table a bit yet. ;-)
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD | 2001-11-15 16:22:48 | Re: [HACKERS] Open Items (was: RE: [HACKERS] Beta going well) |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2001-11-15 16:16:07 | Re: Call for objections: revision of keyword classification |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2001-11-15 16:16:29 | Re: Patch to add Heimdal kerberos support |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2001-11-15 16:16:07 | Re: Call for objections: revision of keyword classification |