Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Open Items (was: RE: [HACKERS] Beta going well)

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at>
Cc: Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Open Items (was: RE: [HACKERS] Beta going well)
Date: 2001-11-15 16:14:19
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.30.0111151427180.633-100000@peter.localdomain (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD writes:

> New patch for open item: AIX compile (Peter E, Zeugswetter)
> (applies to today's snapshot)
>
> I now have a working autoconf, and was thus able to confirm, that
> Peter's SIZEOF_INT8 check works correctly on AIX.

I'm confused a bit:  In the previous message you added a check for uint64,
in this version you removed the u?int64 checks completely.  I suppose it
doesn't matter, but is there a reason?

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2001-11-15 16:14:32
Subject: Re: Call for objections: revision of keyword classification
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2001-11-15 16:07:58
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Open Items (was: RE: [HACKERS] Beta going well)

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2001-11-15 16:14:32
Subject: Re: Call for objections: revision of keyword classification
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2001-11-15 16:13:57
Subject: Re: Patch for Makefile race against current cvs

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group