gabriel writes:

> So my question is why in the first case the postgre did'nt use the index
> and made a seq scan ??

Because it thinks the sequential scan will be faster.  You didn't show any
evidence to the contrary.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net   http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter

In response to

• INDEX BUG??? at 2001-09-03 13:08:40 from gabriel

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2001-09-03 18:22:03
	Subject: Re: cannot detect too many clients
Previous:	From: Stephan Szabo	Date: 2001-09-03 17:43:06
	Subject: Re: INDEX BUG???