Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Permissions for large-object comments

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>, Shane Wegner <shane(at)cm(dot)nu>
Subject: Re: Permissions for large-object comments
Date: 2001-08-25 00:45:40
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.30.0108250241590.677-100000@peter.localdomain (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-generalpgsql-hackers
Tom Lane writes:

> Shane Wegner <shane(at)cm(dot)nu> writes:
> > test=> \lo_unlink 89803
> > ERROR:  pg_description: Permission denied.
>
> Hmm.  Maybe those client-side comment manipulations in psql aren't
> such a hot idea.  I know I never tested them as non-superuser :-(

:-(

> Shane, try that from a superuser Postgres userid.  Meanwhile,
> it's back to the drawing board for us.

I'm not sure about the future of the large objects, so I'm less eager to
invent a new mechanism.  I'm open to ideas, however.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net   http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter


In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Shane WegnerDate: 2001-08-25 00:48:18
Subject: Re: Permissions for large-object comments
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2001-08-25 00:37:48
Subject: Re: /bin/ld -G vs /usr/ccs/bin/cc -G

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Shane WegnerDate: 2001-08-25 00:48:18
Subject: Re: Permissions for large-object comments
Previous:From: Rob ArnoldDate: 2001-08-24 23:12:07
Subject: Re: problems transfering databases

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group