Alex Pilosov writes:

> Dmitry's stuff contains both datatype (uniqueidentifier), a function to
> generate a new object of that type (newid), and a set of functions to
> implement comparison operators for that type.
>
> I don't see anything wrong with that setup, but maybe I'm still missing
> something?

It would be much simpler if you stored the unique id in varchar or text.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net   http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter

In response to

• Re: Re: New data type: uniqueidentifier at 2001-07-02 21:27:37 from Alex Pilosov

Responses

• Re: Re: New data type: uniqueidentifier at 2001-07-03 15:52:31 from Alex Pilosov
• Re: Re: New data type: uniqueidentifier at 2001-07-03 20:19:23 from Dmitry G. Mastrukov

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Martín Marqués	Date: 2001-07-03 15:36:47
	Subject: UNDO and partially commited transactions
Previous:	From: Alex Pilosov	Date: 2001-07-03 15:20:33
	Subject: Re: selecting from cursor