Alex Pilosov writes:
> I don't think you know what UUID is. It is NOT just a unique randon
> number. There are specific rules for construction of such number, specific
> rules for comparison of numbers (no, its not bit-by-bit), thus a datatype
> is most appropriate answer.
A data type may be appropriate for storing these values, but not for
generating them. Functions generate stuff, data types store stuff.
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Alex Pilosov||Date: 2001-07-02 21:27:37|
|Subject: Re: Re: New data type: uniqueidentifier|
|Previous:||From: Nathan Myers||Date: 2001-07-02 18:58:15|
|Subject: Re: shared library strangeness?|