Re: Patch to include PAM support...

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Dominic J(dot) Eidson" <sauron(at)the-infinite(dot)org>, <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Patch to include PAM support...
Date: 2001-06-13 15:18:30
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.30.0106131718130.756-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian writes:

> This seems to fit into the "wait for the perfect fix" solution which I
> don't think applies here. There is no saying that a PAM patch will even
> be around once we get the rest working.
>
> Basically, we have some people who want it. Now we need to hear from
> people who don't want it. I have a "no" from Tom and a "yes" from
> "Peter E" (and the author).

Not in the current form.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-06-13 15:31:13 Re: Patch to include PAM support...
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-06-13 15:07:11 Re: Re: REPLACE INTO table a la mySQL

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-06-13 15:31:13 Re: Patch to include PAM support...
Previous Message Lamar Owen 2001-06-13 14:54:48 Re: Patch to warn about oid/xid wraparound