Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Patch to include PAM support...

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Dominic J(dot) Eidson" <sauron(at)the-infinite(dot)org>, <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Patch to include PAM support...
Date: 2001-06-13 15:18:30
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.30.0106131718130.756-100000@peter.localdomain (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Bruce Momjian writes:

> This seems to fit into the "wait for the perfect fix" solution which I
> don't think applies here.  There is no saying that a PAM patch will even
> be around once we get the rest working.
>
> Basically, we have some people who want it.  Now we need to hear from
> people who don't want it.   I have a "no" from Tom and a "yes" from
> "Peter E" (and the author).

Not in the current form.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net   http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter


In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2001-06-13 15:31:13
Subject: Re: Patch to include PAM support...
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2001-06-13 15:07:11
Subject: Re: Re: REPLACE INTO table a la mySQL

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2001-06-13 15:31:13
Subject: Re: Patch to include PAM support...
Previous:From: Lamar OwenDate: 2001-06-13 14:54:48
Subject: Re: Patch to warn about oid/xid wraparound

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group