Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: reset all update

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Marko Kreen <marko(at)l-t(dot)ee>
Cc: <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: reset all update
Date: 2001-06-12 20:05:29
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.30.0106122204590.756-100000@peter.localdomain (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
Marko Kreen writes:

> On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 09:37:43PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Marko Kreen writes:
> > > *** src/backend/tcop/postgres.c	2001/06/07 04:50:57	1.219
> > > --- src/backend/tcop/postgres.c	2001/06/11 09:17:07
> > > + 	ctx = IsUnderPostmaster ? PGC_BACKEND : PGC_POSTMASTER;
> > > +
> >
> > This is wrong.  If you're in PostgresMain then the context is PGC_BACKEND
> > -- by definition.
>
> Well, but how do you explain this: (line 1463 in current CVS):
>
>          /* all options are allowed if not under postmaster */
>          SetConfigOption(name, value,
>             (IsUnderPostmaster) ? PGC_BACKEND : PGC_POSTMASTER, true);
>
> As I understand, when you run ./postgres directly, you get
> PGC_POSTMASTER, which includes PGC_BACKEND.

You're right.  Objection withdrawn.  ;-)

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net   http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter


In response to

Responses

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2001-06-12 20:26:17
Subject: Re: Patch to include PAM support...
Previous:From: Marko KreenDate: 2001-06-12 20:03:10
Subject: Re: reset all update

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group