Re: Fw: Isn't pg_statistic a security hole - Solution
Proposal
From:
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To:
Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc:
Joe Conway <joe(at)conway-family(dot)com>, <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject:
Re: Fw: Isn't pg_statistic a security hole - Solution
Proposal
Date:
2001-06-02 14:49:11
Message-ID:
Pine.LNX.4.30.0106021647580.763-100000@peter.localdomain (view raw or flat )
Thread:
2001-06-01 06:31:51 from "Joe Conway" <joe(at)conway-family(dot)com>
2001-06-01 15:04:10 from Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
2001-06-01 17:18:07 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2001-06-01 22:33:30 from "Joe Conway" <joe(at)conway-family(dot)com>
2001-06-02 22:14:41 from "Joe Conway" <joe(at)conway-family(dot)com>
2001-06-02 23:26:12 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2001-06-03 03:22:44 from "Joe Conway" <joe(at)conway-family(dot)com>
2001-06-09 22:15:54 from Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
2001-06-09 22:18:33 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2001-06-09 22:20:32 from Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
2001-06-02 14:49:11 from Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
2001-06-02 15:04:05 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2001-06-03 15:18:20 from Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
2001-06-03 17:17:21 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2001-06-06 21:45:57 from "Joe Conway" <joe(at)conway-family(dot)com>
2001-06-06 22:10:00 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2001-06-07 05:09:05 from "Joe Conway" <joe(dot)conway(at)mail(dot)com>
2001-06-07 05:09:27 from "Joe Conway" <joe(at)conway-family(dot)com>
2001-06-07 05:20:02 from "Joe Conway" <joe(at)conway-family(dot)com>
2001-06-07 05:09:31 from "Joe Conway" <joe(at)conway-family(dot)com>
2001-06-07 05:09:35 from "Joe Conway" <joe(at)conway-family(dot)com>
2001-06-07 14:16:33 from Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
2001-06-08 04:06:05 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2001-06-08 16:09:50 from Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
2001-06-09 01:28:20 from "Joe Conway" <joe(at)conway-family(dot)com>
2001-06-09 04:31:21 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2001-06-10 02:26:52 from "Joe Conway" <joe(at)conway-family(dot)com>
2001-06-12 01:44:53 from Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
2001-06-12 01:45:31 from Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
2001-06-12 02:32:14 from "Joe Conway" <joseph(dot)conway(at)home(dot)com>
2001-06-12 02:34:53 from Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
2001-06-14 02:52:59 from Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
2001-06-11 04:57:21 from Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
2001-06-12 16:01:23 from Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
2001-06-12 16:15:22 from Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
2001-06-13 17:22:01 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2001-06-13 21:14:38 from Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
2001-06-14 01:19:52 from "Joe Conway" <joseph(dot)conway(at)home(dot)com>
2001-06-14 01:27:20 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2001-06-14 01:37:00 from "Joe Conway" <joseph(dot)conway(at)home(dot)com>
2001-06-14 01:40:55 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Lists:
pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches
Tom Lane writes:
> Two versions, one that takes an oid and one that takes a name, might be
> convenient. The name version will probably have to accept qualified
> names (schema.table) once we have schema support
Will you expect the function to do dequoting etc. as well? This might get
out of hand.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter
In response to
Responses
pgsql-hackers by date
Next :From: Maks N. PoluninDate: 2001-06-02 14:50:59Subject : large objects dumpPrevious :From : Peter EisentrautDate : 2001-06-02 14:47:48Subject : Re: Proceeding with gettext
pgsql-patches by date
Next :From: Tom LaneDate: 2001-06-02 15:04:05Subject : Re: Fw: Isn't pg_statistic a security hole - Solution Proposal Previous :From : Tom LaneDate : 2001-06-02 14:39:39Subject : Re: show all;
