Tom Lane writes:

> Are you planning to tackle any of the other elog-related stuff that's
> been discussed in the past?  (Automatic file/linenumber information,
> relabeling the set of severity codes, that sort of thing?)

Planning...  I don't think I'm interested in the file/line information,
given the cruftyness it would require.  I can find that information with
find | xargs grep just fine.  Error codes are high on my agenda, but the
specification still needs to be finalized.

> Sooner or later we're going to have to bite the bullet and edit every
> elog instance in the system.

I don't think I want to do that.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net   http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter

In response to

• Re: Proceeding with gettext at 2001-05-30 17:14:48 from Tom Lane

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Peter Eisentraut	Date: 2001-06-02 14:49:11
	Subject: Re: Fw: Isn't pg_statistic a security hole - Solution Proposal
Previous:	From: Kovacs Zoltan	Date: 2001-06-02 11:59:00
	Subject: Re: ERROR: cache lookup for proc 43030134 failed