| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Unused pg_class columns |
| Date: | 2001-05-30 15:39:42 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.30.0105301738460.757-100000@peter.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane writes:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > I removed the reference in pgaccess. After a few releases of pgaccess
> > we can remove the column.
>
> Put it back please. Or have you become the unilateral arbiter of what
> functions pgaccess has?
If pgaccess only reads the column and the backend doesn't use it, it seems
reasonable to remove the reference. It looks like it was a mistake to
begin with.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-05-30 15:42:24 | Re: Unused pg_class columns |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-05-30 15:37:02 | Re: Unused pg_class columns |