Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Re: pgsql + qnx

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: "Tegge, Bernd" <tegge(at)repas-aeg(dot)de>
Cc: Kamil Parkanyi <parkanyi(at)procaut(dot)sk>, <pgsql-ports(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: pgsql + qnx
Date: 2001-05-21 14:59:14
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.30.0105211650020.757-100000@peter.localdomain (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-ports
Tegge, Bernd writes:

> I haven't tried building postgres with the Watcom compiler for 7.1 because
> it does not support 64bit integers. AFAIK that's the default data type for
> OIDs,

Oids are 32 bits, 'unsigned int' to be precise.  Support for 64 bit
integers is completely optional in PostgreSQL.

> BTW., 7.1 does not compile as is with gcc either, I believed the
> required patches made it into the 7.1.1 release but obviously I missed
> the deadline.

I don't think they made that one either.

> Since the ports mailing list does not seem to be archived I have attached
> a copy of the patch (for 7.1 and 7.1.1).

http://www.ca.postgresql.org/mhonarc/pgsql-ports/

> >cc  -I../../../src/include   -c bootstrap.c
> >/usr/watcom/10.6/bin/wcc386 -zq -i=../../../src/include -ms -4r
> >-i=/usr/watcom/10.6/usr/include -i=/usr/include bootstrap.c
> >bootstrap.c(103): Error! E1011: Symbol 'F_BOOLIN' has not been declared

I keep seeing these.  If anyone got a clue, let us know.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net   http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter


In response to

Responses

pgsql-ports by date

Next:From: Fred YankowskiDate: 2001-05-21 15:22:12
Subject: NT service design choices
Previous:From: Tegge, BerndDate: 2001-05-21 09:56:28
Subject: Re: pgsql + qnx

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group