Re: odbc/UnixWare 7.1.1: No Go.

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: odbc/UnixWare 7.1.1: No Go.
Date: 2001-03-24 23:45:22
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.30.0103250044100.2319-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-odbc

Tom Lane writes:

> Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org> writes:
> > I'll take the deafening silence as a NO?
>
> I was (a) waiting to see what Peter thought about it,

Don't ask me, I don't know what this does...

> and (b) wondering
> whether you'd actually tested to see that the built ODBC driver does
> something useful. I'm not eager to risk a post-RC1 change that could
> conceivably break other platforms. Moving ODBC on UW from "doesn't
> compile" to "compiles" isn't enough of a reason to take the risk.
> You need to demonstrate that it moves all the way to "works".

Methinks so too.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://yi.org/peter-e/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Steve Nicolai 2001-03-24 23:54:01 gmake check fails on Solaris 8 with Sun cc
Previous Message Christopher Sawtell 2001-03-24 23:36:35 Re: pgindent run?

Browse pgsql-odbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ludek Finstrle 2001-03-26 07:27:18 Re: pgsqODBC binding parameters II (fwd)
Previous Message Larry Rosenman 2001-03-24 23:36:18 Re: [HACKERS] odbc/UnixWare 7.1.1: No Go.