Re: Reference manual

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Reference manual
Date: 2001-02-09 18:45:51
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.30.0102091944000.1286-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

Vince Vielhaber writes:

> > As far as the HTML-formatted docs go and as far as 7.1 (and future) goes,
> > there should only be exactly one link, which points to the index.html of
> > the intergrated doc. There will no longer be separated docs, because
> > that's why there's an integrated doc with a title page and all the links.
>
> I don't necessarily think this is a good idea.

I don't see a difference in content between

http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/#7.0

and

http://www.postgresql.org/devel-corner/docs/postgres/

(apart from the links to other formats, of course). So could you
elaborate on your concerns?

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://yi.org/peter-e/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vince Vielhaber 2001-02-09 18:54:04 Re: Reference manual
Previous Message Denis Perchine 2001-02-09 18:41:46 Re: [HACKERS] Open 7.1 items