Re: Re: NetBSD/Alpha and rkirkpat's patch [was Re: regress failed tests.. SERIOUS?]

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Thomas T(dot) Thai" <tom(at)minnesota(dot)com>, <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Brent Verner <brent(at)rcfile(dot)org>, Ryan Kirkpatrick <pgsql(at)rkirkpat(dot)net>, Adriaan Joubert <a(dot)joubert(at)albourne(dot)com>, Arrigo Triulzi <arrigo(at)albourne(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Re: NetBSD/Alpha and rkirkpat's patch [was Re: regress failed tests.. SERIOUS?]
Date: 2000-12-31 11:18:59
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.30.0012311216510.776-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-general

Tom Lane writes:

> --- /usr/local/source/postgresql/pgsql/src/backend/main/main.c Fri Nov 24 21:45:47 2000
> +++ /usr/local/build/pgsql-current/src/backend/main/main.c Sat Dec 30 15:06:34 2000
>
> -#if defined(__alpha) && !defined(linux) && !defined(__FreeBSD__)
> +#if defined(__alpha) && !defined(linux) && !defined(__FreeBSD__) && !defined(__NetBSD__)
> #include <sys/sysinfo.h>
> #include "machine/hal_sysinfo.h"
>
> Applied, but I begin to think that we should be testing here for the
> *presence* of a Tru64 symbol, rather than the absence of a bunch of
> other OSes. Anyone know what would be suitable?

__osf__

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://yi.org/peter-e/

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message pgsql-bugs 2001-01-01 01:17:31 vacuum analyze fails with latest cvs version
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-12-31 04:21:04 Re: NetBSD/Alpha and rkirkpat's patch [was Re: regress failed tests.. SERIOUS?]

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Frank Joerdens 2000-12-31 16:44:50 pg_dump segfaults with -z on 6.4
Previous Message Eric Mueller 2000-12-31 06:46:51 detailed docs for functions