Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Updated TODO item

From: Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>
Cc: Kaare Rasmussen <kar(at)kakidata(dot)dk>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Updated TODO item
Date: 2002-01-08 04:26:07
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.21.0201081517040.9642-100000@linuxworld.com.au (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
On Tue, 8 Jan 2002, Thomas Lockhart wrote:

> > > > * Make it easier to create a database owned by someone who can't createdb,
> > > >   perhaps CREATE DATABASE dbname WITH USER = "user"
> > > CREATE DATABASE dbname WITH OWNER = "user"
> > A much better idea. There is no conflict in using OWNER here.
> 
> Does this have the multiple "WITH xxx" clauses which were discussed
> earlier? That is a nonstarter for syntax. There are other places in the

When was it discussed so that I can have a read? I cannot recall it.

And yes, it is not pleasant to implement. Luckily, the design of the
CREATE DATABASE rule had already incorporated the possibility of

...

	WITH LOCATION = ...
	WITH TEMPLAETE = ...

etc.

I'm not sure, however, if this is really what you were asking.

Gavin


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Gavin SherryDate: 2002-01-08 04:42:13
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Updated TODO item
Previous:From: Thomas LockhartDate: 2002-01-08 04:03:42
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Updated TODO item

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Gavin SherryDate: 2002-01-08 04:42:13
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Updated TODO item
Previous:From: Thomas LockhartDate: 2002-01-08 04:03:42
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Updated TODO item

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group