Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Updated TODO item

From: Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Kaare Rasmussen <kar(at)kakidata(dot)dk>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Updated TODO item
Date: 2002-01-05 01:59:32
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.21.0201051250030.19760-101000@linuxworld.com.au (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
On Fri, 4 Jan 2002, Kaare Rasmussen wrote:

> > * Make it easier to create a database owned by someone who can't createdb,
> >   perhaps CREATE DATABASE dbname WITH USER = "user"
> >   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> 
> Shouldn't that be
> 
> CREATE DATABASE dbname WITH OWNER = "user"
> 
> ?
> 

A much better idea. There is no conflict in using OWNER here.

Revised patch attached.

Gavin

Attachment: createdb_with_owner3.patch.gz
Description: application/x-gzip (2.0 KB)

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2002-01-05 02:28:24
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Updated TODO item
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2002-01-05 01:44:17
Subject: Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2002-01-05 02:28:24
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Updated TODO item
Previous:From: Gavin SherryDate: 2002-01-05 01:32:29
Subject: Re: Undocumented feature costs a lot of performance in COPY

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group