Re: [HACKERS] Updated TODO item

From: Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Kaare Rasmussen <kar(at)kakidata(dot)dk>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Updated TODO item
Date: 2002-01-05 01:59:32
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.21.0201051250030.19760-101000@linuxworld.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

On Fri, 4 Jan 2002, Kaare Rasmussen wrote:

> > * Make it easier to create a database owned by someone who can't createdb,
> > perhaps CREATE DATABASE dbname WITH USER = "user"
> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> Shouldn't that be
>
> CREATE DATABASE dbname WITH OWNER = "user"
>
> ?
>

A much better idea. There is no conflict in using OWNER here.

Revised patch attached.

Gavin

Attachment Content-Type Size
createdb_with_owner3.patch.gz application/x-gzip 2.0 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-01-05 02:28:24 Re: [HACKERS] Updated TODO item
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-01-05 01:44:17 Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-01-05 02:28:24 Re: [HACKERS] Updated TODO item
Previous Message Gavin Sherry 2002-01-05 01:32:29 Re: Undocumented feature costs a lot of performance in COPY