Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] What about CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION?

From: Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Jean-Michel POURE <jm(dot)poure(at)freesurf(dot)fr>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] What about CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION?
Date: 2001-10-08 14:43:51
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.21.0110090032500.28028-100000@linuxworld.com.au (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackerspgsql-hackers
On Mon, 8 Oct 2001, Jean-Michel POURE wrote:

> Dear all,

[snip]

> 2) PL/pgSQL default support
> It is sometimes tricky for Windows users to install a language remotely on 
> a Linux box (no access to createlang and/or no knowledge of handlers). So 
> why not enable PL/pgSQL by default?

Could it not just be a feature of pgadmin to allow users to enable
plpgsql? Enabling the language is, after all, just SQL.

As for having it by default, this takes some level of control out of the
hands of the administrator. What if you do not want to allow your users to
create plpgsql functions?

Gavin


In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2001-10-08 15:42:52
Subject: Daily snapshots hosed (was Re: [pgadmin-hackers] What about CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION?)
Previous:From: Dave PageDate: 2001-10-08 14:27:36
Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] What about CREATE OR REPLACE FUNC

pgadmin-hackers by date

Next:From: Jean-Michel POUREDate: 2001-10-08 15:52:02
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] What about CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION?
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2001-10-08 14:13:23
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] What about CREATE OR REPLACE FUNC TION?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group