Re: Very long running query

From: Joel Burton <jburton(at)scw(dot)org>
To: Konstantinos Agouros <elwood(at)agouros(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Very long running query
Date: 2001-04-10 15:38:49
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.21.0104101138220.21912-100000@olympus.scw.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 10 Apr 2001, Konstantinos Agouros wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I have a query running for 97hours now and I am wondering if this can be made
> any faster.
> The Query is:
> insert into dailyreport select timestamp(date '1-8-2001'),a.category,'Observed',sum(b.count) as count from websensebycat a, netscapereduce b where a.url = b.url and a.action='Observed' and a.datum='1-8-2001' and b.datum='1-8-2001' and not exists (select url from urlcounts where urlcounts.url=b.url) group by a.category;
>
> The tables websensebycat and netscapereduce do have indices on it.
> Netscapereduce has 60020 entries and websensebycat has around 6000 entries.
> Urlcounts has 55 entries. The whole thing is running postgres 7.1RC2.
> Anybody has a tip to accelerate this. The whole thing is running on a E250 with
> 64Bit Solaris7.

what does explain command show about your query?

--
Joel Burton <jburton(at)scw(dot)org>
Director of Information Systems, Support Center of Washington

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Mount 2001-04-10 15:55:23 Re: JDBC and Perl compiling problems w/ postgresql-7.1rc4
Previous Message Steve Wampler 2001-04-10 15:32:00 pg_dump dying (and VACUUM ANALYZE woes)...