Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [RFC] Proposed split of -interfaces list ...

From: Cedar Cox <cedarc(at)visionforisrael(dot)com>
To: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Proposed split of -interfaces list ...
Date: 2001-01-18 23:03:43
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.21.0101190058570.5197-100000@nanu.visionforisrael.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-interfaces

On Thu, 18 Jan 2001, The Hermit Hacker wrote:

> 
> okay, so far, its all been positive feedback on this, so I'm going to go
> ahead with it ... with one slight change ...
> 
> when we did the php list, I did it as:
> 
> pgsql-php(at)postgresql(dot)org -and- comp.databases.postgresql.interfaces.php
> 
> that way, for email purposes, the address was shorter, less to type in ...
> 
> I'd like to do the same with the jdbc and odbc lists, unless anyone has an
> objection to typing 11 characters less in an email address? :)
> 
> On Thu, 18 Jan 2001, Adam Lang wrote:
> 
> > I agree also... I don't do C programming, so a huge chunk of the list info I
> > scan and delete.  Sounds logical.

Sounds good to me.. and if for some reason someone doesn't want the split,
they can simply subscribe to all three lists, which isn't a big deal.  
With that done, they still get everything, just with different addresses,
which would be good for filtering/sorting.

..and dropping '-interfaces' sounds fine, but really doesn't make any
difference to me.

-Cedar


In response to

pgsql-interfaces by date

Next:From: Gunnar R|nningDate: 2001-01-19 00:53:57
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Re: Fixes and enhancements to JDBC driver (take 2)
Previous:From: Barry LindDate: 2001-01-18 22:17:26
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Re: Fixes and enhancements to JDBC driver (take 2)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group