Re: Re: Commit finished?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: Commit finished?
Date: 2000-11-15 17:45:46
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.21.0011151844180.779-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane writes:

> distclean does not remove gram.c because we include gram.c in the
> distribution. Perhaps there should be another target that gets rid
> of *all* the derived files (maintainer-clean might be the GNU-approved
> name for that, not sure). Peter, any comment here?

Not only that, but we've had it for several months... :-)

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://yi.org/peter-e/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-11-15 17:54:34 Re: Re: UUNET socket-file-location patch
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-11-15 17:45:08 WHERE-clause evaluation order (was Problem with BETWEEN and a view)