Re: Why is failure to find file a "NOTICE"?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Why is failure to find file a "NOTICE"?
Date: 2000-11-03 20:50:27
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.21.0011032147370.1076-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane writes:

> > [*] -- The postmaster should refuse to start when the data directory is
> > not an absolute path. I'm on that.
>
> Either that, or convert it to an absolute path. The problem is that the
> backends chdir() to their individual databases' data directories, so
> relative paths that were OK from the postmaster's perspective are no
> good anymore.

Is there a profound reason for this chdir()?

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://yi.org/peter-e/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-11-03 20:55:11 Re: Why is failure to find file a "NOTICE"?
Previous Message Ian Lance Taylor 2000-11-03 20:48:07 Re: [HACKERS] 7.0.3 branded