Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Docs reorganization

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
Subject: Re: Docs reorganization
Date: 2000-09-30 14:01:21
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.21.0009301539240.377-100000@peter (view raw or whole thread)
Lists: pgsql-docs
Peter Eisentraut writes:

> With the extra month I'd like to do the reorganization of the docs into
> one <Set>, which was discussed a while ago.  Then we'd only have one HTML
> set to build and don't have to ship redundant versions.

Oh well, somebody was faster... :-)  When was the last time the following
was updated though?

If we're already at that point then we can abandon the separate user.sgml,
etc. and make links across books, right?

Peter Eisentraut      peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to


pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2000-09-30 16:32:30
Subject: doc/src/sgml/S-Tree_indexes.html.gz?
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2000-09-30 11:07:15
Subject: Docs reorganization

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2015 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group