Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Docs reorganization

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
Subject: Re: Docs reorganization
Date: 2000-09-30 14:01:21
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.21.0009301539240.377-100000@peter (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs
Peter Eisentraut writes:

> With the extra month I'd like to do the reorganization of the docs into
> one <Set>, which was discussed a while ago.  Then we'd only have one HTML
> set to build and don't have to ship redundant versions.

Oh well, somebody was faster... :-)  When was the last time the following
was updated though?

	http://www.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/index.html

If we're already at that point then we can abandon the separate user.sgml,
etc. and make links across books, right?

-- 
Peter Eisentraut      peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net       http://yi.org/peter-e/


In response to

Responses

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2000-09-30 16:32:30
Subject: doc/src/sgml/S-Tree_indexes.html.gz?
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2000-09-30 11:07:15
Subject: Docs reorganization

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group