Tom Lane writes:
> OK. BTW, what is the status of the changeover you proposed re using
> OIDs instead of int4 userids as the unique identifiers for users?
Because of the pg_dumpall thing that had to be postponed for another
release, otherwise the users would be associated to the wrong groups on
> In other words, should my field be type Oid or type int4?
Interesting question, actually, because the master uid global variable has
always been a Oid type but it was mostly referenced as int4. Considering
that we have a whole oid/int4 mess and that you can't have negative uid's
anyway, you might as well go for the Oid now if you don't mind.
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://yi.org/peter-e/
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Peter Eisentraut||Date: 2000-09-28 08:52:38|
|Subject: Re: The Data Base System is in recovery mode |
|Previous:||From: Jon Franz||Date: 2000-09-28 03:53:44|
|Subject: Re: Roadmap for a Win32 port|