Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [PATCH]: Building PostgreSQL 7.0.2 on Cygwin 1.1.4 (Take 2)

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Jason Tishler <Jason(dot)Tishler(at)dothill(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-ports(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: Building PostgreSQL 7.0.2 on Cygwin 1.1.4 (Take 2)
Date: 2000-09-28 08:37:32
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.21.0009281033380.363-100000@peter (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-ports
Jason Tishler writes:

> I ran the regression tests on the Cygwin PostgreSQL build.  All tests
> except for two passed.  So following the instructions found near the
> beginning of regress.out, I am reporting "any apparent problems" found
> to the list.
> 
> The two tests that failed are horology and random.  See attached for diffs
> between the expected and results.  My guess is that the horology failures
> can be safely ignored.  Unfortunately, I'm not quite so sure for random.

The horology result is a known failure on platforms that don't properly
support daylight savings time before 1970.  Add the following line to the
file resultmap (at the end, for example):

	horology/*-*-cygwin*=horology-no-DST-before-1970

then that test should pass.  I will do the same thing in the development
branch.

The random test can indeed be safely ignored, the point being that this
test may fail randomly.


-- 
Peter Eisentraut      peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net       http://yi.org/peter-e/


In response to

Responses

pgsql-ports by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2000-09-28 08:42:19
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: Building PostgreSQL 7.0.2 on Cygwin 1.1.4 (Take 2)
Previous:From: Jason TishlerDate: 2000-09-28 01:18:34
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: Building PostgreSQL 7.0.2 on Cygwin 1.1.4 (Take 2)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group