| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | pgsql-ports(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Shared library search paths |
| Date: | 2000-07-18 18:18:14 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.21.0007180233540.2925-100000@localhost.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-ports |
Some platforms (OSF/cc, HPUX) are already using -rpath or equivalent, so
you don't have to specify a shared library search path at runtime. I think
that a lot more platforms could use this. Can people comment on whether
and how it works on their platform? Essentially,
LDFLAGS+=-rpath '$(libdir)'
might do the trick for most.
--
Peter Eisentraut Sernanders väg 10:115
peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net 75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2000-07-18 18:28:04 | Re: Warnings triggered by recent includefile cleanups |
| Previous Message | Jan Wieck | 2000-07-18 16:33:06 | Re: Untrusted PL/Tcl? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Urban Widmark | 2000-07-18 19:36:05 | RE: PostgreSQL ld.so.1 problem (solaris) |
| Previous Message | Ben Reed | 2000-07-18 15:42:02 | Problems compiling 6.5.3 on solaris 2.6 |