Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: 7.0.2 on Solaris

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 7.0.2 on Solaris
Date: 2000-06-29 23:32:04
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.21.0006292228400.397-100000@localhost.localdomain (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
pgsql-hackers(at)thewrittenword(dot)com writes:

> Ok. So should I get CVS and reapply my patches?

Well, let's see:

> 1. -DDISABLE_COMPLEX_MACRO

This clearly needs to be fixed the right way. I'll take care of it.

> 2. Solaris CC does not like "-K PIC". It does like "-KPIC" though.

Also no problem.

> 3. NAN

We need a real solution for this. I'll look into it.

> 4. I moved some of the information out of
> src/interfaces/libpq++/Makefile.in into src/Makefile.shlib

I think we don't want that.

> 5. added '-' before pl/tcl/Makefile so make does not complain

That I can do as well. I confirmed that it works okay.

> 6. When building C++ shared libraries and archives under Solaris with
> the Sun C/C++ compiler, use it to build the libraries and archives,
> not ld/ar.

This is similar to the IRIX case apparently, so okay.

> 7. Honor CXXFLAGS from configure command-line.

Should work fine.

> 8. (AC_CHECK_LIB(util,main))

I don't think we want to try that now. I happen to know that the -lutil
case was added for setproctitle() so I can change that, but the rest is
just a cosmetics issue, unless you can prove breakage. 


-- 
Peter Eisentraut                  Sernanders väg 10:115
peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net                   75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/            Sweden


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2000-06-29 23:32:20
Subject: Re: Big 7.1 open items
Previous:From: Stephan SzaboDate: 2000-06-29 19:50:02
Subject: Re: AW: Proposal: More flexible backup/restore via pg_dump

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group