Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for port testing on fmgr changes -- Results!

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql(at)rkirkpat(dot)net, pgsql-ports(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for port testing on fmgr changes -- Results!
Date: 2000-06-26 01:41:50
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.21.0006251642130.11966-100000@localhost.localdomain (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-ports
Tom Lane writes:

> What surprises me more is the implication that this is the only place
> that makes such a bogus assumption about the size of time_t.  I'd have
> guessed there are more places...

A lot of those were fixed for 7.0.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut                  Sernanders väg 10:115
peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net                   75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/            Sweden


In response to

pgsql-ports by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2000-06-26 03:31:39
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for port testing on fmgr changes -- Results!
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2000-06-26 01:41:12
Subject: .exe extension on Windows

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2000-06-26 01:41:58
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] CLASSOID patch
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2000-06-26 01:41:41
Subject: Re: About the pid and opts files

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group