Re: AW: Performance (was: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySqlserver))

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at>
Cc: "'Bruce Momjian'" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "'pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: AW: Performance (was: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySqlserver))
Date: 2000-05-25 23:51:33
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.21.0005251356400.348-100000@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Zeugswetter Andreas SB writes:

> Which is imho not what the test is for. I think they mean ctid,
> which again I think we should have a rowid alias for (as in Informix,
> Oracle).

Let's step back and ask: How is the behaviour of rowid (or whatever)
defined in various existing DBMS. Then we can see if we have anything that
matches.

--
Peter Eisentraut Sernanders väg 10:115
peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net 75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2000-05-25 23:52:38 Re: \dS and \df <pattern> crashing psql
Previous Message The Hermit Hacker 2000-05-25 23:49:50 Re: Any reason to use pg_dumpall on an idle database